The book "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks", by Rebecca Skloot. Contains many stories about how doctors were doing research on patients without their consent, also without informing them of what they were going to be tested for. This is an irresponsible incident that occurred during the 1940’s and 1950’s. However, there is no justification for this, because we all have the right to pursuit the truth and doctors should most respect patients’ decisions before they are being tested for any kind of research.
I wasn't aware of this history before a read the book that doctors were doing research on patients without their consent and knowledge. For example, on chapter 25 “The doctor also gathered samples of Moore’s blood and other tissue on future visits; he told Moore’s that his continued health depended upon such testing but did not reveal that he was keeping the samples to aid in his research. The resulting cell line, Mo, now has a market value of around $3 billion…”. According to this Moore’s doctor took his blood and other tissue sample to keep them in his research without his permission.
In conclusion, i think that doctors and researchers of the past had a completely difference basic view of people than they do today. Therefore, doctors and researchers of the past doesn’t tolerate patients own decision. They were using patients as a research subjects, most of the time without their consent, also without their knowledge. However, doctors and researchers most take patients opinion seriously before they are being tested for any kind of research. Because, humans have the right to pursuit the truth of what they are going to be tested and decide to whether do it or not doctors most respect their decision.